Today News Journal
    What's Hot

    DOJ sues Norfolk Southern over toxic train derailment in Ohio

    March 31, 2023

    Social Security funding crisis will arrive in 2033, U.S. projects

    March 31, 2023

    Richard Branson’s Virgin Orbit to lay off 85 percent of staff

    March 31, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Today News Journal
    Contact Us
    • Home
    • Trending
    • Business
    • Health
    • Technology
      • Automobile
      • Gadgets
      • Mobiles
      • Robotics
    • Lifestyle
      • Culture
    • Sports
    • Travel
    • Editorials
    • News
      • Politics
    Today News Journal
    Home » News » The Chief Justice’s Wife Has Every Right to Her Legal Career
    News

    The Chief Justice’s Wife Has Every Right to Her Legal Career

    James MartinBy James MartinFebruary 2, 2023No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp VKontakte Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email



    Comment

    The search for conflicts of interest in the personal lives of the Supreme Court justices has reached a new level of paranoia with the suggestion that Chief Justice John Roberts’s wife, Jane Sullivan Roberts, somehow shouldn’t be allowed to do her job as a legal recruiter.

    The suggestion seems to have arisen from a letter to Congress from one of Sullivan Roberts’s former colleagues, a man who was fired from the recruiting firm and sued over his dismissal. Rather than dismissing him as a disgruntled ex-employee, the New York Times amplified his concerns and quoted Richard Durbin, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, as saying the letter raised “troubling issues that once again demonstrate the need” for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court.

    But this would be the wrong fight for liberals to pick. As it happens, Mrs. Roberts has showed exemplary concern about avoiding even the appearance of impropriety. She switched careers from being a law firm partner to being a recruiter after her husband became chief justice, a move that must be viewed as a sacrifice in a sexist world where women still comprise less than a quarter of major law-firm partners.

    As a recruiter, her stated policy since 2007 has been to avoid anything connected to her husband and not do work with litigators who are actively arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court. The letter from the former colleague reportedly does not cite any evidence to the contrary, suggesting rather that she has worked with firms that have had business before the court — as essentially all large firms do at some time.

    The chief justice, for his part, has demonstrated the kind of judicial independence that lands you in the position of being widely criticized on both the left and the right. The idea that he would be influenced in a case by the fact that his wife makes a living by helping law firms hire new people — and therefore gets paid a fee by those firms — is about as preposterous as it gets. Even Roberts’s critics, liberal and conservative alike, acknowledge his profound commitment to protecting and preserving the institutional legitimacy of the Supreme Court. He is universally recognized as one of the paragons of ethical behavior in the legal world today, a kind of Republican version of Merrick Garland.

    But the true problem lies deeper, in the implicit assumption that the spouse of a justice should be some kind of Caesar’s wife, held to an impossible standard that would effectively require her to have no career at all.

    Consider that the justices all went to law school and worked in legal environments. It should come as no surprise that several are married to lawyers. Those lawyers will naturally want to work in their chosen fields. They should not have to quit because their spouses ascend to the bench.

    Consider, too, that the current suggestion of potential conflict is being raised for a justice’s wife, not a justice’s husband. Somehow, in the course of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s long and distinguished judicial career, no one seriously proposed that her husband, Marty Ginsburg, who was a renowned expert in tax law, give up his position at a major Washington law firm.

    Beyond gender equity, there are other strong reasons to allow justices’ spouses to stay in the legal workforce — subject to the principle that they should avoiding actual conflicts or the meaningful appearance of conflict.

    To be clear, I am not talking about the question of a justice’s spouse (call her, say, Ginni Thomas) denying the election results or communicating with the White House or a presidential campaign when issues related to the election are before the Supreme Court. That separate issue is really about whether the justice should be recused, not about conflict-of-interest rules, which are about financial interests.

    Rather, I am saying that the ordinary principles that govern conflict of interest should be applied sensibly to justices’ spouses, not applied in an extreme fashion that impugns their integrity without evidence or much reasoning.

    I am also not weighing in here on whether Congress should try to force a code of ethics on the Supreme Court justices. Anyway, the constitutionality of such a move would be judged by, you guessed it, the Supreme Court justices.

    My argument, rather, is that we should not police the justices’ spouses in such a restrictive way that they cannot participate as normal people in their chosen professions. It serves no useful purpose to break norms of attorney-client privilege by mandating that Jesse Barrett disclose his clients, any more than would-be ethics watchdogs should be scrutinizing Dr. Patrick Jackson’s surgical patients to see if they have business before the court. (They are the spouses of justices Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson.)

    There comes a point where demanding unnecessary transparency from justices’ spouses may become a form of professional interference. If we don’t like the justices, we are free to say so. Making their spouses’ lives difficult to serve a personal or political agenda is bad for the court and the country.

    Isolated, embattled justices are not going to be better justices. The justices need professional and personal contacts to stay sane and to understand the world as it is — the way we all do.

    We will make much better ethical judgments if we acknowledge that the justices are human beings with real lives. To paraphrase Shakespeare’s Richard II, they live on bread like we do. They feel want, taste grief, and need friends. That includes some of them having spouses who work.

    The more we treat the justices as though they are a coterie of cloistered monks and nuns hidden away from the real world, the more likely they are to lose sight of real-world consequences. Haven’t we gone far enough in that direction already? That’s not the court we want. It is certainly not the court we need.

    More From This Author at Bloomberg Opinion:

    • Supreme Court’s ‘Nostalgia Doctrine’ Is Trump’s Biggest Legacy

    • A Conservative Theory Too Extreme Even for This Supreme Court

    • Abortion Pill Lawsuit Won’t Get a Fair Shake in Post-Roe America

    This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

    Noah Feldman is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A professor of law at Harvard University, he is author, most recently, of “The Broken Constitution: Lincoln, Slavery and the Refounding of America.”

    More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion



    Source link

    Related posts:

    1. FTC plunges in workplace rankings during Lina Khan’s first year
    2. Chips Act Skips US Leaders for Asian Winners
    3. Homebuyers Might as Well Take the Plunge
    4. Elon Musk scraps Twitter’s work from home policy | Twitter
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Previous ArticleBiden Faces His Nixon Moment on Alaskan Oil
    Next Article Why Congo and Rwanda Are at Each Other’s Throats
    James Martin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    DOJ sues Norfolk Southern over toxic train derailment in Ohio

    March 31, 2023

    Social Security funding crisis will arrive in 2033, U.S. projects

    March 31, 2023

    Richard Branson’s Virgin Orbit to lay off 85 percent of staff

    March 31, 2023

    Credit Suisse helping ultra-rich Americans evade taxes: Senate panel

    March 31, 2023

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Search
    Categories
    • Automobile
    • Business
    • Coronavirus
    • Culture
    • Editorials
    • Finance
    • Gadgets
    • Health
    • Lifestyle
    • Mobiles
    • Money
    • News
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Travel
    • Trending
    • World
    Latest Posts

    DOJ sues Norfolk Southern over toxic train derailment in Ohio

    March 31, 2023

    Social Security funding crisis will arrive in 2033, U.S. projects

    March 31, 2023

    Richard Branson’s Virgin Orbit to lay off 85 percent of staff

    March 31, 2023

    Yorkshire racism allegations: Vaughan cleared, three charges against Hoggard considered proven – live | Yorkshire

    March 31, 2023
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    Don't Miss
    News

    DOJ sues Norfolk Southern over toxic train derailment in Ohio

    By James MartinMarch 31, 20230

    Comment on this storyCommentThe Justice Department filed a major civil suit Friday against Norfolk Southern…

    Social Security funding crisis will arrive in 2033, U.S. projects

    March 31, 2023

    Richard Branson’s Virgin Orbit to lay off 85 percent of staff

    March 31, 2023

    Yorkshire racism allegations: Vaughan cleared, three charges against Hoggard considered proven – live | Yorkshire

    March 31, 2023
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    About Us

    Hello friends, I am James Martin. Welcome to my blog todaynewsjournal.com. We are a team of experienced journalists who are passionate about delivering the latest news and current events to our readers. Our editorial team is dedicated to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information possible. We aim to be your go-to source for news and current events. Here on this site, You will get up to date information regarding all important categories like business ideas, health tips,... (Read More)

    Latest News

    DOJ sues Norfolk Southern over toxic train derailment in Ohio

    March 31, 2023

    Social Security funding crisis will arrive in 2033, U.S. projects

    March 31, 2023

    Richard Branson’s Virgin Orbit to lay off 85 percent of staff

    March 31, 2023
    SIGN UP NEWSLETTER

    Join The Conversation sign up to receive emails for The Daily special tips general info.

      Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
      • Home
      • Editorials
      • Get In Touch

      Copyright © 2021-2023 · Today News Journal Privacy Policy

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

      We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
      Cookie SettingsAccept All
      Manage consent

      Privacy Overview

      This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
      Necessary
      Always Enabled
      Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
      CookieDurationDescription
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
      cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
      viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
      Functional
      Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
      Performance
      Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
      Analytics
      Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
      Advertisement
      Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
      Others
      Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
      SAVE & ACCEPT

      Sign In or Register

      Welcome Back!

      Login to your account below.

      Lost password?